Uncovering the Secret of Insect Resistance Through the qPCR Method Lab Test

Insect resistance to insecticides is a serious challenge in pest control. Early detection of resistance is crucial for evaluating insecticide effectiveness and preventing failure in pest management.

One widely used method for accurately identifying insect resistance is qPCR (quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction). This method enables rapid and specific detection of genes or mutations involved in insecticide resistance.

This article will discuss the working principles of qPCR in detecting insect resistance, as well as its advantages and limitations in both laboratory and field applications.

qPCR Method for Measuring Insectiside Effectiveness Against Insects

qPCR is a method used to detect and analyze the level of insect resistance to insecticides. The working principle of qPCR begins with the sample preparation stage, where DNA or RNA is extracted from the insect population under study. If the study is RNA-based, such as gene expression analysis, the RNA is first converted into complementary DNA (cDNA) through a reverse transcription process.

Read more:
Difference between Conventional PCR and Real-Time PCR

Next, the target gene selection process is carried out by identifying genes associated with insecticide resistance. The selected gene serves as a marker in the analysis process. To ensure specific amplification, primers and probes are designed to recognize only the target gene or related mutations. In qPCR, two main methods are used for DNA amplification detection: TaqMan probes and SYBR Green dye.

TaqMan probes are specific oligonucleotides labeled with a fluorescent reporter and quencher, where fluorescence increases as the probe degrades during amplification. Meanwhile, SYBR Green is a dye that binds to double-stranded DNA, allowing fluorescence detection during amplification.

The amplification and quantification process is conducted in a thermal cycler that monitors fluorescence in real time. In each PCR cycle, the target DNA amount doubles, and fluorescence intensity increases as more amplification products are generated. The key result observed in qPCR is the cycle threshold (Ct) value, which represents the cycle at which fluorescence exceeds a predetermined threshold.

The final stage of qPCR is data analysis, where Ct values are compared with appropriate controls, such as insect populations susceptible to insecticides or known standards. This analysis determines the presence of resistance markers, the expression levels of resistance genes (if using RNA/cDNA), and gene copy number variations, such as gene duplications. Thus, qPCR provides accurate information on insecticide effectiveness and aids in insect resistance management.

qPCR has been successfully used to detect various insecticide resistance genes in insect populations. A key example is the kdr mutation in the vgsc gene, which confers resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. The L1014F mutation in Culex mosquitoes has been detected with high accuracy using RT-qPCR, enabling the mapping of this mutation’s frequency in mosquito populations. Additionally, other mutations like L1014S have also been identified using molecular methods.

In Anopheles gambiae, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has identified several SNPs in vgsc associated with insecticide resistance, including V402L, L995F, and N1570Y. Besides vgsc, mutations in other genes such as ace1, gste2, and rdl have also been detected using multiplex PCR and NGS. Mutations like A296G in rdl and several alterations in gste2 contribute to insect resistance.

Apart from genetic mutations, resistance can also result from increased detoxification enzyme activity, such as P450. In Spodoptera exigua, high expression of several CYP genes (CYP6AE97, CYP321A9, etc.) has been linked to resistance against various insecticides. This enzyme-based detoxification mechanism has been widely reported in multiple studies as a major factor in insect resistance to insecticides.

Advantages and Limitations of the qPCR Method for Measuring Insecticide Effectiveness Against Insects

qPCR has several advantages that make it an effective method for detecting insect resistance to insecticides. One of its main strengths is its high sensitivity and specificity in detecting resistance markers. With this capability, qPCR can identify even small amounts of target DNA or RNA in a sample, ensuring accurate and reliable results.

Additionally, qPCR provides quantitative results, meaning it not only detects the presence of resistance genes but also precisely measures gene expression levels or mutation frequencies. This is highly useful for assessing the degree of resistance in an insect population to a specific insecticide.

Another advantage is its relatively fast processing time compared to conventional biological assays, such as bioassays, which often take several days or weeks to yield results. With qPCR, results can be obtained within hours, allowing for quicker decision-making in resistance management strategies.

Despite its many advantages, qPCR also has some limitations that need to be considered. One major limitation is the requirement for prior knowledge of the resistance markers being analyzed. This means that before conducting qPCR, preliminary research must be done to identify specific mutations or genes involved in resistance to a particular insecticide. If this information is unavailable, qPCR cannot be effectively utilized.

Another limitation is the relatively high cost of equipment and reagents, which can be a challenge for field applications or laboratories with limited resources. qPCR machines require a significant investment, and the reagents used, such as probes and enzymes, are also quite expensive. This makes qPCR more suitable for laboratories with well-established facilities rather than as a field detection method that is easily accessible.

As insecticide resistance becomes more prevalent, a data-driven approach is becoming increasingly important. qPCR methods allow for rapid and accurate detection of resistance genes. Test in a trusted laboratory to ensure the effectiveness of your insecticide before control failure occurs.

Author: Dherika
Editor: Sabilla Reza

References:

Acford-Palmer, H., Phelan, J.E., Tadesse, F.G. et al. (2023). Identification of two insecticide resistance markers in Ethiopian Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes using a multiplex amplicon sequencing assay. Sci Rep, 13(5612), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32336-7.

Biswas, T. (2023). Insights into qPCR: Protocol, Detection Methods, and Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.the-scientist.com/insights-into-qpcr-protocol-detection-methods-and-analysis-71478 (Accessed: March 2nd, 2025).

Campos, M., Phelan, J., Spadar, A. et al. (2022). High-throughput barcoding method for the genetic surveillance of insecticide resistance and species identification in Anopheles gambiae complex malaria vectors. Sci Rep, 12(13893), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17822-8.

Kralik, P., Ricchi, M. (2017). A basic guide to real time PCR in microbial diagnostics: definitions, parameters, and everything. Front. Microbiol. 8(108), 1-9. Doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00108.

Siddiqui JA, Fan R, Naz H, Bamisile BS, Hafeez M, Ghani MI, Wei Y, Xu Y and Chen X. (2023). Insights into insecticide resistance mechanisms in invasive species: Challenges and control strategies. Front. Physiol, 13(1112278), 1-18. Doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1112278.

Share your love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hubungi kami untuk informasi yang Anda perlukan.

Silakan konsultasikan kebutuhan pengujian produk Anda dengan tim ahli kami secara gratis.

Formulir Kontak